Weather Talk For BC no matter what you ride

Latest spit news

Off Topic Comments, Help, Tips and Trick

by drummermom » Thu Feb 24, 2022 11:24 am

Whalepuke…. Regarding your comment…..
So the first words that came to mind was FUCK YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!

Couldn’t agree more. Fuck them all for what they’ve done.
Just saying’.
drummermom
 
Posts: 377
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:22 am

by DavidJames » Sun Feb 27, 2022 2:49 pm

so how much of the rest of the spit is going to go? I usually come late and launch 1/2 way down it..... or is it all going to go?
DavidJames
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2014 7:02 pm

by Ryan » Sun Feb 27, 2022 5:22 pm

All the way to the yellow gate will be removed (edit: see above, only about just over a third of the way to the yellow gate). It will be possible to launch from there but may be a bit too gusty for kites.
I once helped a guy who almost got himself dragged over the rocks trying to launch up river.

Getting back won't always be easy.
Last edited by Ryan on Sun Feb 27, 2022 6:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Ryan
 
Posts: 447
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 3:19 pm

by JonathanP » Sun Feb 27, 2022 6:08 pm

All the way to the yellow gate? Last I heard, it was 300m this year and then more subsequent years depending on silt flow into the terminal.
JonathanP
 
Posts: 210
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 2:06 pm

by Ryan » Sun Feb 27, 2022 6:25 pm

Hey Jonathan, That's good news, I see it mentioned here. https://www.squamishchief.com/local-new ... un-5006558 .


"As of the week of Jan. 31, crews will start removing the southernmost section of Spit Road. This will ultimately total to about 300 metres of removed berm. If the 300-metre removal does not affect the nearby port, crews will remove an additional 600 metres of berm.

The 600-metre removal project will require an approval process similar to this current job, but Tobe said she expects it will be much faster this time around, as all the requisite studies have already been done."
User avatar
Ryan
 
Posts: 447
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 3:19 pm

by Ryan » Thu Mar 10, 2022 10:29 am

They are only removing the top half of the old spit so it will still be exposed at around a tide of about 1.7m. See picture from the Squamish Chief Facebook page.

spit.JPG
#photo
spit.JPG (255.94 KiB) Viewed 7267 times


spit2.JPG
#photo
spit2.JPG (361.66 KiB) Viewed 7266 times
User avatar
Ryan
 
Posts: 447
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 3:19 pm

by Slappy » Thu Mar 10, 2022 3:54 pm

Ryan wrote:They are only removing the top half of the old spit so it will still be exposed at around a tide of about 1.7m.


Odd choice since at low tide all the fry salmon will once again be pushed out in to the sound instead of the estuary.
User avatar
Slappy
 
Posts: 1571
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2013 8:31 am

by Ryan » Fri Mar 11, 2022 10:26 am

Odd choice since at low tide all the fry salmon will once again be pushed out in to the sound instead of the estuary.


Yes, very strange, one would think they'd want to maximise the salmons' chances of getting into the estuary. Maybe it has something to do with the terminal getting silted up?
User avatar
Ryan
 
Posts: 447
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 3:19 pm

by JonathanP » Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:08 pm

Logic tells me that salmon entering the estuary and the terminal being free of silt are mutually exclusive unless the 'realignment' is done and the majority of original river course is restored. The hallmark feature of BCs natural estuaries is extensive fanning shallows and shall streams that seals can't access. I don't think that's compatible with ocean liners.

Somehow this got framed as kiters vs salmon, but has always been industry vs salmon.
JonathanP
 
Posts: 210
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 2:06 pm

by Slappy » Fri Mar 11, 2022 12:46 pm

Ryan wrote:They are only removing the top half of the old spit so it will still be exposed at around a tide of about 1.7m.


Also this makes me think piling in a simple elevated foot path would be financially viable.

Image
User avatar
Slappy
 
Posts: 1571
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2013 8:31 am

PreviousNext

Return to General