C36 wrote:I sent a note off to the contact person at Squamish Terminals asking if they are testing ocean water quality (as their release of Apr 24 doesn't mention it) and I will post their response.
Mike wrote:Good question Dave. I had also sent a follow up question about testing and the health/enviro. Folks requirements/necessity for west of the terminal.
Thanks Mike.
Jack1587 wrote:Here's some news on the water
Good news
"All results received to-date for deposition (surface wipe samples) are internally consistent and indicate PAH concentrations were below laboratory method detection limits and that fallout or deposition from the fire was at such low levels (none was detected) that there is little or no risk of negative impact to surfaces including soil, vegetation and water"
Off of Squamish.ca
Careful - this information is posted under the heading of "Particulate sampling test results" - to my understanding they are testing for air borne particulate the has travelled in the air and has since settled on surfaces (including soil, vegetation and water). From the map of the plume zone from the fire most of these particulates would have travelled in land.
What I am more concerned about is the toxins that may have dripped from the dock itself directly into the ocean water during the fire (by products of asphalt and creosote being burned at high temperatures).